General
GREAT COVE REALTY CO., INC., et al. v. BRENNER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, et al.
365 U.S. 769·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GREAT COVE REALTY CO., INC., et al. v. BRENNER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SUFFOLK COUNTY, et al.
No. 675.
Decided April 17, 1961.
Arthur Karger for appellants.
John P, Cohalan, Jr. for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.