Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. National Steel Corp. et al., 1967 — 386 U.S. 1000 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. National Steel Corp. et al.
386 U.S. 1000·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 13, 1967.
No. 31.
United States v. National Steel Corp. et al.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States. . Denman Moody, C. Brien Dillon and E. W. Barnett for National Steel Corp. et' al., and B. J. Bradshaw for Brown et al., appellees.
[For earlier orders herein, see 383 U.. S. 905, ante, p. 939.]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. S. D. Tex. Appeal dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.