Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harry HENRY, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY, Girlie Strosnider and R. N. Strosnider, Appellees, 1934 — 73 F.2d 1001 · caselaw · US
General
Harry HENRY, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY, Girlie Strosnider and R. N. Strosnider, Appellees
73 F.2d 1001·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry HENRY, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY, Girlie Strosnider and R. N. Strosnider, Appellees.
No. 7417.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 21, 1934.
I. Henry Harris, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Frank S. Hutton, of Los Angolés, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of appellees, ordered appeal dismissed for failure of appellant to file record and docket cause; mandate forthwith.