Bankruptcy
KRAEMER HOSIERY COMPANY et al. v. DICKSON-IVES COMPANY, Alleged Bankrupt et al.
46 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KRAEMER HOSIERY COMPANY et al. v. DICKSON-IVES COMPANY, Alleged Bankrupt et al.
No. 6017.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 6, 1931.
Claude L. Gray and John Tilden, both of Orlando, Fla., for appellants.
T. Picton Warlow, Le Eoy B. Giles,' J. Thomas Gurney, and John G. Baker, all of Orlando, Fla., and Franklin N. Wood, of Daytona Beach, Fla., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In the above numbered and entitled cause, come the appellees, by their respective counsel, and confess that in the record and proceedings of the court below there is reversible error. Because of said error so confessed, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decree of the said District Court in said cause be, and the same is, reversed, and that said cause be, and it is hereby, remanded to the said District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida for further proceedings. It is further ordered that the mandate of this court shall issue without delay.