Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bethilda Glass, Respondent, v. Benjamin McAllister, Jr., Appellant, 1865 — 31 N.Y. 50 · caselaw · US
General
Bethilda Glass, Respondent, v. Benjamin McAllister, Jr., Appellant
31 N.Y. 50·New York Court of Appeals·1865·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bethilda Glass, Respondent, v. Benjamin McAllister, Jr., Appellant.
[MAJORITY — Davies, J.]
Davies, J.
No points have been furnished by the appellant. The action was for work and labor, furnished by the plaintiff for the defendant, and upon the facts found by the referee, there is no legal objection to the recovery. Bo question of law is presented for review in this court, and the judgment should therefore be affirmed with costs.