Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Oliver L. Jones, Appellant, v. Joseph E. Daly et al., as Executors of Augustin Daly, Deceased, Respondents, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 520 · caselaw · US
General
Oliver L. Jones, Appellant, v. Joseph E. Daly et al., as Executors of Augustin Daly, Deceased, Respondents
175 N.Y. 520·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Oliver L. Jones, Appellant, v. Joseph E. Daly et al., as Executors of Augustin Daly, Deceased, Respondents.
Jones v. Daly, 73 App. Div. 820, affirmed.
(Argued June 10, 1903;
decided June 25, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 25, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
J. Langdon Ward and James P. Albright for appellant.
Stephen H. Olin and Edward H. Daly for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.