Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles H. Woodward v. The Holland Medicine Company et al.; Frank L. Anderson, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 631 · caselaw · US
General
Charles H. Woodward v. The Holland Medicine Company et al.; Frank L. Anderson, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
152 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles H. Woodward v. The Holland Medicine Company et al.; Frank L. Anderson, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Reported below, 9 App. Div. 632.
(Argued March 1, 1897;
decided March 9, 1897.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 29,1896, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment was not a final judgment.
Le Roy Parker for motion.
Charles B. Wheeler opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.