General
Apodaca v. Texas
444 U.S. 987·Supreme Court of the United States·1979
Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a properly presented federal question. Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 79-5323.
Apodaca v. Texas.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from County Ct. at Law No. 2, El Paso County, Tex., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Stewart would dismiss the appeal for want of a properly presented federal question. Mr. Justice Marshall would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.