Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
LION OIL REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. B. RANDLE, 1934 — 76 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
General
LION OIL REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. B. RANDLE
76 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LION OIL REFINING COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. B. RANDLE.
No. 9985.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Nov. 28, 1934.
Jeff Davis, of El Dorado, Ark., for appellant.
John E. Harris, of Fort Smith, Ark., and E. L. Compere, of Hamburg, Ark., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, each party to bear his or its costs in this court, per stipulation of parties.