Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary Riordan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy J. Riordan, Deceased, Appellant, v. American Tobacco Company, Respondent, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
Mary Riordan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy J. Riordan, Deceased, Appellant, v. American Tobacco Company, Respondent
185 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Riordan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy J. Riordan, Deceased, Appellant, v. American Tobacco Company, Respondent.
Riordan v. American Tobacco Co., 107 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
(Argued April 2, 1906;
decided April 24, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of tire Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in tire first judicial department, entered October 20, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s intestate.
Frank Parker Ufford and Philip Carpenter for appellant.
Frank Verner Johnson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight and Werner, JJ. Dissenting: Edward T. Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.