Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Portland Railway, Light & Power Company et al., Appellants, v. The City of Portland et al., 1910 — 218 U.S. 686 · caselaw · US
General
Portland Railway, Light & Power Company et al., Appellants, v. The City of Portland et al.
218 U.S. 686·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 176.
Portland Railway, Light & Power Company et al., Appellants, v. The City of Portland et al.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon.
October 11, 1910.
Mr. Frederick V. Holman for appellants.
No appearance for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed with costs, oh motion of counsel for the appéllants.