Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel R. Chichester, Respondent, v. Winton Motor Carriage Company, Appellant, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 513 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel R. Chichester, Respondent, v. Winton Motor Carriage Company, Appellant
191 N.Y. 513·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel R. Chichester, Respondent, v. Winton Motor Carriage Company, Appellant.
Chichester v. Winton Motor Carriage Co., 115 App. Div. 904, affirmed.
(Argued January 27, 1908;
decided February 18, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 27, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action for conversion.
Edwin R. Root, Charles Thaddeus Terry and Edward Ward McMahon for appellant.
Henry H. Sawyer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.