Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George J. Grossman, Respondent, v. Ephraim M. Kantrowitz et al., Appellants, 1892 — 132 N.Y. 594 · caselaw · US
General
George J. Grossman, Respondent, v. Ephraim M. Kantrowitz et al., Appellants
132 N.Y. 594·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George J. Grossman, Respondent, v. Ephraim M. Kantrowitz et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 16, 1892;
decided April 19, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made October 24, 1890, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
./S'. F. Fneelamd for appellants.
'Abram Fling for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
.Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.