Contracts · MBE-tested
China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; and Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.
390 U.S. 974·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 933,
No. 934,
October Term, 1966.
October Term, 1966.
China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.; and Lan Jing-Chau et al. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. et al.,
Arthur J. Mandell on the motion for American Trial Lawyers Association, Admiralty Section.
[MAJORITY]
386 U. S. 933, 1000.
Motion of American Trial Lawyers Association, Admiralty Section, for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, in support of petition for second rehearing denied. Motions for leave to file second petitions for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.