General
Peter B. Bradley et al., Respondents, v. Charles F. Bridge et al., as Receivers of the Bradley Salt Company, Respondents. Walter H. Bradley, Appellant, and Edward H. Morris et al., Respondents
186 N.Y. 518·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter B. Bradley et al., Respondents, v. Charles F. Bridge et al., as Receivers of the Bradley Salt Company, Respondents. Walter H. Bradley, Appellant, and Edward H. Morris et al., Respondents.
Bradley v. Bridge, 101 App. Div. 611, affirmed.
(Argued June 18, 1906;
decided October 2, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made November 15,1904, affirming an interlocutory and a final judgment entered upon the report of a referee in an action to settle the rights of the plaintiffs and the defendants as to certain assets of the Bradley Salt Company.
P. M. French for appellant.
' For dee Me Quire for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ. f^bsent: O’Brien, J. Not sitting: Chase, J.