Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
City Company of New York, Inc. v. Stern; and Chase Securities Corp. v. Vogel, 1941 — 312 U.S. 666 · caselaw · US
Securities
City Company of New York, Inc. v. Stern; and Chase Securities Corp. v. Vogel
312 U.S. 666·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 79.
No. 89.
City Company of New York, Inc. v. Stern; and Chase Securities Corp. v. Vogel.
March 31, 1941.
Messrs. M. J. Doherty and Wilfrid E. Bumble for petitioner in No. 79. Messrs. F. H. Stinchfield and S. S. Jennings, Jr. for petitioner in No. 89. Mr. Benedict Deinard for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are reversed. Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., 311 U. S. 538; Pomeroy v. National City Co., 209 Minn. 155; 296 N. W. 513; Donaldson v. Chase Securities Corp., 209 Minn. 165; 296 N. W. 518. The causes are remanded to the Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings with respect to any questions not determined by the Supreme Court of Minnesota in the Pomeroy and Donaldson cases.