Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McCrea v. Michigan; Wilcox v. Michigan; Way v. Michigan; Landsberg v. Michigan; Elliott v. Michigan; Stambaugh v. Michigan; and Malone v. Michigan, 1943 — 318 U.S. 783 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
McCrea v. Michigan; Wilcox v. Michigan; Way v. Michigan; Landsberg v. Michigan; Elliott v. Michigan; Stambaugh v. Michigan; and Malone v. Michigan
318 U.S. 783·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 651.
McCrea v. Michigan; Wilcox v. Michigan; Way v. Michigan; Landsberg v. Michigan; Elliott v. Michigan; Stambaugh v. Michigan; and Malone v. Michigan.
No. 738.
No. 739.
No. 740.
No. 741.
No. 742.
No. 771.
April 5, 1943.
Messrs. William E. Leahy and Nicholas J. Chase for petitioners in Nos. 651 and 771; and Mr. John A. Bresnahan for petitioners in Nos. 738, 739, 740, 741, and 742. Messrs. Herbert J. Rush-ton, Attorney General of Michigan, and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied. The stay orders heretofore entered are vacated.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.