Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. et al. v. United States, 1949 — 338 U.S. 831 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. et al. v. United States
338 U.S. 831·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 195.
Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Assn., Inc. et al. v. United States.
William E. Leahy, Elwood H. Seal, William J. Hughes, Jr., John J. Wilson, Samuel O. Clark, Jr., W. Gwynn Gardiner, John F. Hillyard, Elisha Hanson, Arthur B. Hanson and William Blum, Jr. for petitioners. George T. Washington, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Bergson and Richard E. Guggenheim for the United States. Seward A. Miller and Marion R. Garstang filed a brief for the National Cooperative Milk Producers Federation, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.