Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Job Traffarn et al., Respondents, v. John Cary et al., Appellants, 1874 — 57 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Job Traffarn et al., Respondents, v. John Cary et al., Appellants
57 N.Y. 663·New York Commission of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Job Traffarn et al., Respondents, v. John Cary et al., Appellants.
(Submitted January 14, 1874;
decided May term, 1874.)
The principal points in this appeal were upon exceptions to findings of fact. Held, that there was some evidence to sustain them.
Abram I. Mereness for the appellants.
C. D. Adams for the respondents.
[MAJORITY — Reynolds and Earl, CO.,]
Reynolds and Earl, CO.,
read for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.