Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL STOCK YARDS NATIONAL BANK v. UNITED STATES of America, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
NATIONAL STOCK YARDS NATIONAL BANK v. UNITED STATES of America
65 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL STOCK YARDS NATIONAL BANK v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 4791.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
May 6, 1933.
I. N. Nelson, of Chicago, 111., for appellant.
Paul F. Jones, U. S. Atty., of Danville, 111., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by tbéir counsel and present and file a stipulation of counsel, which provides that the same judgment be entered in this cause as was entered on December 7, 1932, in cause No. 4792, National Cattle Loan Company v. United States of America, 62 F.(2d) 168.
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said District Court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.