General
MUHAMMAD TEMPLE OF ISLAM OF SHREVEPORT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT et al., Defendants-Appellees
517 F.2d 922·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Before THORNBERRY, SIMPSON and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MUHAMMAD TEMPLE OF ISLAM OF SHREVEPORT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 75-1190
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 13, 1975.
Frank E. Brown, Jr., Hilry Huckaby, III, Shreveport, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Charles C. Grubb, John Gallagher, Shreveport, La., for defendants-appellees.
Before THORNBERRY, SIMPSON and RONEY, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
We have reviewed the record in the instant case and agree with the opinion of the district court, Muhammad Temple of Islam of Shreveport v. City of Shreveport, 387 F.Supp. 1129 (W.D.La.1974). Additionally we note that the Supreme Court decision in Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. The Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 95 S.Ct. 1612, 44 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975) forecloses appellants claim for attorney’s fees on the private attorneys general theory. The judgment is affirmed.