Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louis H. Gein, Respondent, v. William McCarty Little, Appellant, Impleaded with Another, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 528 · caselaw · US
General
Louis H. Gein, Respondent, v. William McCarty Little, Appellant, Impleaded with Another
186 N.Y. 528·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis H. Gein, Respondent, v. William McCarty Little, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.
Gein v. Little, 102 App. Div. 614, appeal dismissed.
(Argued October 1, 1906;
decided October 9, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 17, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment was not appealable to the Court rf Appeals, the action being upon an individual bond, the judgment of the Appellate Division being unanimous and permission to appeal not having been granted.
Lynn W. Thompson for motion.
Alexander Thain opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.