General
Fine et al. v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority et al.
385 U.S. 845·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 302.
Fine et al. v. Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority et al.
Roger F. Turner and Bernard G. Sykes for petitioners.
Laurence S. Fordham for respondent Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.