Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New Jersey v. New York et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 853 · caselaw · US
General
New Jersey v. New York et al.
346 U.S. 853·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 5,
Original, October Term, 1950.
New Jersey v. New York et al.
Denis M. Hurley, John P. McGrath, Jeremiah M. Evarts, James J. Thornton and Richard H. Burke for the City of New York. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, Robert Peacock, Deputy Attorney General, and Kenneth H. Murray for the State of New Jersey.
[MAJORITY]
The motion of the City of New York for leave to file an amended petition to modify the decree is granted and the parties are allowed thirty days within which to answer the amended petition.