Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Accounting of Edward Mitchell et al., as Executors of Benjamin D. Silliman, Deceased, Appellants. Caroline S. Taylor et al., Respondents, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 567 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Accounting of Edward Mitchell et al., as Executors of Benjamin D. Silliman, Deceased, Appellants. Caroline S. Taylor et al., Respondents
188 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Accounting of Edward Mitchell et al., as Executors of Benjamin D. Silliman, Deceased, Appellants. Caroline S. Taylor et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 6, 1907;
decided April 2, 1907.)
Matter of Mitchell, 115 App. Div. 904, affirmed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 16, 1906, which affirmed a decree of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the executors herein.
John M. Bowers and William Mitchell for appellants.
Edmund- L. Baylies and David II. M. Weynberg for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Willard Bartlett, IIiscock and Chase, JJ.