Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re ULROP-HUFF CO. Inc. Appeal of WHITEHOUSE, DAVIS & CO., Inc., 1925 — 9 F.2d 924 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In re ULROP-HUFF CO. Inc. Appeal of WHITEHOUSE, DAVIS & CO., Inc.
9 F.2d 924·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re ULROP-HUFF CO. Inc. Appeal of WHITEHOUSE, DAVIS & CO., Inc.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 2, 1925.)
No. 75.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.
Appeal from Pinal Order in Bankruptcy Entered in the District Court for the Western District of New York.
Averill & Tompkins, of Rochester, N. Y. (Arthur Mayer, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Isaac Adler, of Rochester, N. Y., for appellee.
Before HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order (9 F.[2d] 922) affirmed.