Contracts · MBE-tested
LUCIGNANO et al. v. UNITED STATES
384 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LUCIGNANO et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 1058.
Decided June 20, 1966.
Michael A. Querques and Daniel E. Isles for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgments are vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.