Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martin Behrer et al., Appellants, v. City and Suburban Homes Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others, 1908 — 191 N.Y. 530 · caselaw · US
General
Martin Behrer et al., Appellants, v. City and Suburban Homes Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others
191 N.Y. 530·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Martin Behrer et al., Appellants, v. City and Suburban Homes Company, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.
Behrer v. McMillan, 114 App. Div. 450, affirmed.
(Argued February 20, 1908;
decided March 10, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 16,1906, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant, respondent, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
H. Schieffelin Sayers for appellants.
Arthur F. Cosby for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.