General
O'DONNELL v. GILLESPIE
261 F. 48·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1919
Before HOOK and STONE, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’DONNELL v. GILLESPIE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
September 22, 1919.)
No. 5347.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge.
Suit by E. N. Gillespie against Dennis O’Donnell. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
John B. Arnold, of New York City, and P. W. Cress, of Perry, Okl., for appellant.
Robert J. Dodds, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and C. B. Ames, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (W. A. Sipe, Jr., of Tulsa, Okl., on the-brief), for appellee.
Before HOOK and STONE, Circuit Judges, and AMIDON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — STONE, Circuit Judge.]
STONE, Circuit Judge.
This is another of the similar cases tried with Washburn v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 41, - C. C. A. -, decided at this term. The contentions are embraced in those determined in the case of Washburn and the case of Wright v. Gillespie, 261 Fed. 46,-C. C. A.-, also decided at this term. The additional claim that the lease was to have been like the Wright lease and was to be nonassignable was determined adversely by the trial court, with whose conclusion we agree.
The decree should be affirmed.