Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Harris, Administrator, v. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co., 1941 — 313 U.S. 541 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
Harris, Administrator, v. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co.
313 U.S. 541·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 629.
Harris, Administrator, v. Zion’s Savings Bank & Trust Co.
Argued March 31, 1941.
Decided April 14, 1941.
Mr. J. D. Skeen for petitioner. Mr. Hadlond P. Thomas for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Upon appeal from an order of the Probate Court of Salt Lake County, Utah, purporting to authorize an administrator of a deceased farmer to file a petition for relief under § 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, the Supreme Court of Utah has held that under the Probate Code of the State the Probate Court had no power to make the order. The decision thus rests upon an adequate non-federal ground, and as the federal question, whether in such circumstances a District Court of the United States sitting in bankruptcy could entertain a petition of the personal representative of the deceased farmer under § 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, was not necessarily involved, the writ of certiorari is dismissed.