Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John J. Casale, Inc. v. United States et al., 1944 — 321 U.S. 752 · caselaw · US
General
John J. Casale, Inc. v. United States et al.
321 U.S. 752·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 704.
John J. Casale, Inc. v. United States et al.
March 6, 1944.
Mr. Charles E. Cotterill for appellant. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Delaware.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Illinois Central R. Co., 244 U. S. 82, 89; Federal Power Commission v. Edison Co., 304 U. S. 375, 384—5; Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United States, 307 U. S. 125, 130.