Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Moskowitz v. Power et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 882 · caselaw · US
General
Moskowitz v. Power et al.
396 U.S. 882·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. • — .
Moskowitz v. Power et al.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Philip Kahaner and Robert S. Hammer, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents Power et al., and Joseph Slavin and Eugene Victor for respondent Lerner, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. N. Y. Application for temporary restraining order presented to Mr. Justice Harlan, and by him referred to the Court, denied.