Tax
METROPOLITAN TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
46 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
METROPOLITAN TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 53.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Jan. 5, 1931.
W. W. Spalding, of Washington, D. C., and Arthur J. Cohen, of New York City (Cohen, Cole, Weiss & Wharton, of New York City, and Mason, Spalding & MeAtee,. of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and. Andrew D. Sharpe and Sewall Key, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and R. N. Shaw, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both óf Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.