Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
White v. Texas, 1940 — 309 U.S. 641 · caselaw · US
General
White v. Texas
309 U.S. 641·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 87.
White v. Texas.
April 22, 1940.
Mr. Carter Wesley for petitioner.
Messrs. Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General of Texas, George W. Bar-cus, Assistant Attorney General, and Lloyd W. Davidson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
This cause is set for May 20, 1940, in order to afford to the State of Texas the opportunity to present its contentions upon the questions set forth in subdivisions (e), (f), (g), (h), and (j) of paragraph 4 of its petition for rehearing. The case will be heard on briefs and oral argument, or on briefs alone if that is desired, briefs to be filed and served on or before the date above mentioned.