Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert Boyd, Appellant, v. The New York Security and Trust Company et al., Respondents, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 556 · caselaw · US
Securities
Robert Boyd, Appellant, v. The New York Security and Trust Company et al., Respondents
176 N.Y. 556·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert Boyd, Appellant, v. The New York Security and Trust Company et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 85 App. Div. 581.
(Argued October 5, 1903;
decided October 13, 1903.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 4, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment appealed from was not appealable of right to the Court of Appeals, and that permission to appeal had not been granted nor had the Appellate Division certified that a question of law was involved which ought to be reviewed.
James F. O’Beirne for motion.'
Lewis Johnston opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.