Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES ex rel. Martine GINAL, Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, Commissioner of Immigration, Port of New York, Appellee, 1927 — 22 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES ex rel. Martine GINAL, Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, Commissioner of Immigration, Port of New York, Appellee
22 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES ex rel. Martine GINAL, Appellant, v. Benjamin M. DAY, Commissioner of Immigration, Port of New York, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 14, 1927.
No. 118.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Appeal from a decree dismissing a writ of habeas corpus to review an order of deportation.
Gaspare M. Cusumano, of New York City, for appellant.
Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Edward Feldman, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City., of counsel), for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, on the authority of U. S. ex rel. David v. Tod, 289 F. 60 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. ex rel. Patton v. Tod, 297 F. 385 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. ex rel. Danikas v. Day, 20 F.(2d) 733, 736 (C. C. A. 2).