Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. POLLARD; UNITED STATES v. KOHN; UNITED STATES v. STANTON, 1870 — 154 U.S. 577 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. POLLARD; UNITED STATES v. KOHN; UNITED STATES v. STANTON
154 U.S. 57719 L. Ed. 620·Supreme Court of the United States·1870
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. POLLARD. UNITED STATES v. KOHN. UNITED STATES v. STANTON.
APPEALS EROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
Nos. 391, 359, 390.
Argued February 8, 9, 10, 1870.
Decided February 28, 1870.
Affirmed on the authority of United States y. Anderson, 9 Wall. 56.
The case is stated in the opinion.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Davis]
Mr. Justice Davis
delivered the opinion of the court.
There are no material points of difference between these cases and the case of The United States v. Anderson, 9 Wall. 56, decided at this term, and the views presented in that case dispose of these.
The judgment of the Court of Claims in each of the above-named cases is Affirmed,
Mr. Attorney General and Mr. B. S. Hale for appellant.
Mr. A.- G. Biddle for Pollard, Mr. J. A. Wills for Kohn, and Mr. George. Taylor for Stanton. .