Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Fay, Respondent, v. John C. McGuire et al., Composing the Firm of McGuire & Low, Appellants, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Fay, Respondent, v. John C. McGuire et al., Composing the Firm of McGuire & Low, Appellants
162 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ob. J., Gray, - O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Fay, Respondent, v. John C. McGuire et al., Composing the Firm of McGuire & Low, Appellants.
Fay v. McGuire, 20 App. Div. 569, affirmed.
(Argued April 2, 1900;
decided April 17, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered respectively, October 13 and October 5, 1897, in favor of plaintiff, upon the submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts, under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
John C. McGuire for appellants.
Jacob H. Shaffer and Béla D. Eisler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ob. J., Gray, - O’Brien, Haight, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Cullen, J.