Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arizona Publishing Co. v. O'Neil et al., Members of and Constituting the State Tax Commission of Arizona, 1938 — 304 U.S. 543 · caselaw · US
Tax
Arizona Publishing Co. v. O'Neil et al., Members of and Constituting the State Tax Commission of Arizona
304 U.S. 543·Supreme Court of the United States·1938
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 960.
Arizona Publishing Co. v. O’Neil et al., Members of and Constituting the State Tax Commission of Arizona.
Decided May 2, 1938.
Messrs. Elisha Hanson and John Mason Ross for appellant.
Mr. Allan K. Perry for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed, Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U. S. 233, 250; Associated Press v. Labor Board, 301 U. S. 103, 133; Giragi v. Moore, 301 U. S. 670.