Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York Infant Asylum, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant, 1902 — 171 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
General
New York Infant Asylum, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant
171 N.Y. 640·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
New York Infant Asylum, Respondent, v. The City of Mount Vernon, Appellant.
N. T. Infant Asylum v. Oity of Mount Vernon, 64 App. Div. 621, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted April 11, 1902;
decided April 18, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 22, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
William J. Marshall for appellant.
Arthur M. Johnson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs, on opinion in Archer v. City of Moumt Vernon (171 N. Y. 639).
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.