Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Bank of Commerce, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles S. Wiltsie, Prosecuting Attorney
189 U.S. 505·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 196.
Bank of Commerce, Plaintiff in Error, v. Charles S. Wiltsie, Prosecuting Attorney.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana.
Argued March 10, 11, 1903.
Decided March 16, 1903.
Mr. Augustin Boice for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Merrill Moores, Mr. W. L. Taylor and Mr. C. C. Hadley for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Mallett v. North Carolina, 181 U. S. 592; Mutual Life Insurance Company v. McGrew, 188 U. S. 291; and cases cited. See 153 Indiana, 460-474.