Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Brownell, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Singer; Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Liquidator, v. Singer; Bartholomew v. Illinois, 1954 — 347 U.S. 970 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Brownell, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Singer; Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Liquidator, v. Singer; Bartholomew v. Illinois
347 U.S. 970·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 401.
No. 402.
No. 78,
Misc.
Brownell, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Singer, Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Liquidator, v. Singer, Bartholomew v. Illinois,
[MAJORITY]
ante, p. 403;
ante, p. 403; and
346 U. S. 841. Petitions for rehearing denied.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.