Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel W. Lewis, Appellant, 1892 — 136 N.Y. 633 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel W. Lewis, Appellant
136 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel W. Lewis, Appellant.
(Argued October 20, 1892;
decided November 29, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 31,1891, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace of the city and county of Rew York, entered upon a verdict convicting defendant of grand larceny in the first degree.
Herbert W. Qri/ndal for appellant.
Hewry B. B. Stapler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.