Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong; Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong; Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong, 1893 — 150 U.S. 90 · caselaw · US
General
Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong; Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong; Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong
150 U.S. 9037 L. Ed. 1010·Supreme Court of the United States·1893
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 38.
Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong. Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong. Schuyler National Bank v. Bollong.
No. 39.
No. 317.
Error bo the Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Argued with No. 518, October 17, 1893.
Decided October 30, 1893.
Mr. J. G. Bigelow, (with whom was Mr. William Twombly .on the brief,) for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. G. T. Phelps, Mr. J. A. Grimison and Mr. G. 0. Sabin filed briefs' for defendants in error; but the court did not call upon them.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chiee Justice Fuller :]
Mr. Chiee Justice Fuller :
These cases were submitted at the same time with Schuyler National Bank v. Hector C. Bollong, just decided, and must be disposed of in the same way.
Writs of error dismissed.