Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Candy Co. v. Federal Trade Commission; March of Time Candies, Inc. v. Same; and Dietz Gum Co. et al. v. Same, 1939 — 308 U.S. 610 · caselaw · US
General
National Candy Co. v. Federal Trade Commission; March of Time Candies, Inc. v. Same; and Dietz Gum Co. et al. v. Same
308 U.S. 610·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 444.
No. 445.
No. 446.
National Candy Co. v. Federal Trade Commission; March of Time Candies, Inc. v. Same; and Dietz Gum Co. et al. v. Same.
November 13, 1939.
Messrs. Abraham Lowehhaupt and Irvin H. Fathchild for petitioners. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Arnold, and Messrs. James C. Wilson, Wilber Stammler, and W. T. Kelley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied..
Reported below: 104 F. 2d 999.