Contracts · MBE-tested

CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner v. Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT.

138 S. Ct. 1683201 L. Ed. 2d 34·Supreme Court of the United States·2018

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

CITY OF HAYS, KANSAS, Petitioner v. Matthew Jack Dwight VOGT. No. 16-1495. Supreme Court of the United States May 29, 2018. David R. Cooper, Lauren Laushman, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith LLP, Topeka, KS, John T. Bird, City Attorney, Glassman, Bird, Brown, & Powell LLP, Hays, KS, Toby J. Heytens, Daniel R. Ortiz, University of Virginia, School of Law, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Charlottesville, VA, for Petitioner. Morgan L. Roach, McCauley & Roach, LLC, Kansas City, MO, Kelsi Brown Corkran, Thomas M. Bondy, Benjamin Chagnon, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Daniel A. Rubens, Alison M. Kilmartin, Haley Jankowski, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY, for Respondent. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered. Justice GORSUCH took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.