Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Scales v. United States; Lightfoot v. United States, 1957 — 353 U.S. 979 · caselaw · US
General
Scales v. United States; Lightfoot v. United States
353 U.S. 979·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 29.
No. 32.
Scales v. United States. Lightfoot v. United States.
Telford Taylor for petitioner in No. 29. John J. Abt for petitioner in No. 32. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Tompkins, Harold D. Koffsky and William F. O’Donnell for the United States. With them on the brief in No. 29 were Kevin T. Maroney and Philip T. White. Barent Ten Eyck filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 350 U. S. 992, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; and
Certiorari, 350 U. S. 992, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. No. 29, argued October 10-11, 1956; No. 32, argued October 11,1956. These cases are restored to the docket for reargument.
Reported below: No. 29, 227 F. 2d 581; No. 32, 228 F. 2d 861.