Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isaac Goldwater, Respondent, v. The Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance Company, Appellant, 1888 — 109 N.Y. 618 · caselaw · US
General
Isaac Goldwater, Respondent, v. The Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance Company, Appellant
109 N.Y. 618·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isaac Goldwater, Respondent, v. The Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance Company, Appellant.
(Argued March. 1, 1888;
decided March 20, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fifth judicial department, made January 5, 1886, which granted a motion to set aside a verdict, directed for defendant, and for a new trial.
George F. Yeoman for appellant.
William Nathaniel Cogswell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below, and for judgment absolute against the appellant on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.