Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The National Commercial Bank of Albany, Appellant, v. The Lackawanna Transportation Company, Respondent, 1902 — 172 N.Y. 596 · caselaw · US
General
The National Commercial Bank of Albany, Appellant, v. The Lackawanna Transportation Company, Respondent
172 N.Y. 596·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The National Commercial Bank of Albany, Appellant, v. The Lackawanna Transportation Company, Respondent.
National Commercial Bank v. Lackawanna Transp. Co., 59 App. Div. 270, affirmed.
(Argued June 23, 1902;
decided October 7, 1902.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 19, 1900, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
John M. Bowers, William Lamsimg and Latham G. Reed for appellant.
John G. Milburn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Bbien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.