Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Upper Dublin versus Germantown, 1793 — 2 U.S. 213 · caselaw · US
Tax
Upper Dublin versus Germantown
2 U.S. 2132 Dall. 213·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1793·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April Term, 1793.
Upper Dublin versus Germantown.
[MAJORITY]
TWO Justices made an order, removing Rachel Peters, as a Pauper, from Germantown to Upper Dublin. On appeal, the Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County confirmed the order. It was brought into this Court by Certiorari ; and the fact upon which Upper Dublin relied, was, that the two Justices, at the time the order was made, were inhabitants of, and rateable and contributary to the poor tax of Germantown.
Upon argument by Rawle, for Upper Dublin, and Ingersoll, for Germantown, the Court, unanimously, quashed the order of Sessions, and the order of the two Justices.